Data Quality Alerts and Pipeline Reliability in Urban Mobility Streams

Authors

  • Avery E. Richardson Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Author

Keywords:

Data Quality, Pipeline Reliability, Graph Analysis, Urban Mobility, Machine Learning

Abstract

The exponential growth of urban mobility data streams has fundamentally transformed the operational capabilities of smart city infrastructures. However, maintaining the reliability of the complex data pipelines that process these streams remains a formidable challenge. Data quality alerts, which indicate anomalies such as missing values, schema drifts, or unexpected latency, are frequently generated but rarely analyzed in terms of their systemic impact on overall pipeline reliability. This paper investigates the relationship between localized data quality alerts and systemic pipeline failures using advanced graph analysis techniques. By modeling urban mobility data pipelines as directed acyclic graphs, we systematically evaluate how data quality degradation cascades through interdependent processing nodes. Through extensive simulation and empirical observation of urban mobility streams including vehicular telemetry and public transit ticketing events, we demonstrate that the topological properties of the pipeline graph significantly influence the propagation of quality errors. Furthermore, we introduce novel resilience metrics based on graph centrality and connectivity to predict downstream failures before they occur. Our findings indicate that analyzing data quality alerts through a graph-theoretical lens provides actionable insights into pipeline vulnerabilities, enabling data engineers to design more robust, fault-tolerant streaming architectures. This research bridges the gap between discrete data quality monitoring and holistic system reliability engineering.

References

1. Bhattarai, D.; Lucieer, A.; Lovell, H.; Aryal, J. Remote Sensing of Night-Time Lights and Electricity Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Geogr. Compass 2023, 17, e12684.

2. Celestina, C.; Hunt, J.R.; Sale, P.W.G.; Franks, A.E. Attribution of crop yield responses to application of organic amendments: A critical review. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 186, 135–145.

3. Pizer, S.M.; Amburn, E.P.; Austin, J.D.; Cromartie, R.; Geselowitz, A.; Greer, T.; ter Haar Romeny, B.; Zimmerman, J.B.; Zuiderveld, K. Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1987, 39, 355–368.

4. Fortin-Gagnon, O.; Leroux, M.; Stevanovic, D.; Surprenant, S. A large canadian database for macroeconomic analysis. Can. J. Econ. Can. D’économique 2022, 55, 1799–1833.

5. Gomes, H.M.; Read, J.; Bifet, A.; Barddal, J.P.; Gama, J.A. Machine learning for streaming data: State of the art, challenges, and opportunities. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2019, 21, 6–22.

6. Lucas Filho, E.R.; Savva, G.; Yang, L.; Fu, K.; Shen, J.; Herodotou, H. Employing Streaming Machine Learning for Modeling Workload Patterns in Multi-Tiered Data Storage Systems. Future Internet 2025, 17, 170.

7. Chen, H.; Zhou, E.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z. An RNN Based Mechanism for File Prefetching. In Proceedings of the 2019 18th International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications for Business Engineering and Science (DCABES), Wuhan, China, 8–10 November 2019; pp. 13–16.

8. Yu, H.; Lu, J.; Zhang, G. An Online Robust Support Vector Regression for Data Streams. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022, 34, 150–163.

9. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining—KDD ’16; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 785–794.

10. Chen, C.; Ye, W.; Zuo, Y.; Zheng, C.; Ong, S.P. Graph Networks as a Universal Machine Learning Framework for Molecules and Crystals. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 3564–3572.

11. Du, H.; Wang, J.; Hui, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. DenseGNN: Universal and Scalable Deeper Graph Neural Networks for High-Performance Property Prediction in Crystals and Molecules. npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 292.

12. Hasan, M.S.; Nosonovsky, M. Triboinformatics: Machine Learning Algorithms and Data Topology Methods for Tribology. Surf. Innov. 2022, 10, 229–242.

13. Sarkar, R.; Ray, R.L. Application of artificial neural network algorithms to estimate spatial soil organic carbon stock in Prairie lands from remote sensing and soil data pool. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2597423.

14. Bifet, A.; Holmes, G.; Pfahringer, B.; Kranen, P.; Kremer, H.; Jansen, T.; Seidl, T. MOA: Massive Online Analysis, a Framework for Stream Classification and Clustering. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Applications of Pattern Analysis, Windsor, UK, 1–3 September 2010; Volume 11, pp. 44–50.

15. Carbajal, M.; Ramírez, D.A.; Turin, C.; Schaeffer, S.M.; Konkel, J.; Ninanya, J.; Rinza, J.; Mendiburu, F.D.; Zorogastua, P.; Villaorduña, L.; et al. From Rangelands to Cropland, Land-Use Change and Its Impact on Soil Organic Carbon Variables in a Peruvian Andean Highlands: A Machine Learning Modeling Approach. Ecosystems 2024, 27, 899–917.

16. Ashbaugh, M.; Kittner, N. Addressing Extreme Urban Heat and Energy Vulnerability of Renters in Portland, OR with Resilient Household Energy Policies. Energy Policy 2024, 190, 114143.

17. Bokati, L.; Somenahally, A.; Kumar, S.; Robatjazi, J.; Talchabhadel, R.; Sarkar, R.; Perepi, R. Temporal adjustment approach for high-resolution continental scale modeling of soil organic carbon. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 6483.

18. Chernis, T.; Sekkel, R. A dynamic factor model for nowcasting Canadian GDP growth. Empir. Econ. 2017, 53, 217–234.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

Issue

Section

Articles