Misinformation Spread and Network Centrality Features across Social Media Cascades
Keywords:
Network Centrality, Misinformation Spread, Social Media Cascades, Benchmark Study, Machine LearningAbstract
The rapid proliferation of misinformation across online platforms represents a critical challenge to contemporary societal stability, democratic processes, and public health. This benchmark study investigates the structural dynamics of information diffusion by analyzing the relationship between network centrality features and the spread of unverified claims within social media cascades. Utilizing a massive dataset of distinct diffusion networks, this research isolates the topological characteristics of users who participate in the sharing of verified news versus those who propagate falsehoods. The study systematically evaluates multiple dimensions of network centrality, including degree, betweenness, closeness, and eigenvector centrality, to determine their predictive power regarding cascade depth, breadth, and virality. Findings indicate that misinformation cascades are structurally distinct, relying heavily on peripheral nodes that achieve transient high betweenness centrality, acting as critical bridges between largely disconnected echo chambers. Furthermore, the velocity of false information spread is strongly correlated with the rapid activation of nodes possessing high eigenvector centrality within the early stages of the cascade lifecycle. By mapping these structural signatures, this paper provides robust empirical evidence supporting the use of topological feature engineering for early detection systems. The insights derived from this comprehensive analysis offer profound theoretical and practical implications for platform administrators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to mitigate the impact of malicious information campaigns without compromising the principles of free expression.References
1. Kalambukattu, J.G.; Kumar, S.; Das, B.; Roy, T. Digital mapping of soil organic carbon in the hilly and mountainous landscape of Indian Himalayan region employing machine-learning techniques. Discov. Soil 2025, 2, 35.
2. Herodotou, H.; Kakoulli, E. Cost-based Data Prefetching and Scheduling in Big Data Platforms over Tiered Storage Systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2023, 48, 1–40.
3. Jia, L.; Mcmahon, J.P.; Gudaparthi, S.; Singh, S.; Balasubramonian, R. PATHFINDER: Practical Real-Time Learning for Data Prefetching. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, La Jolla, CA, USA, 27 April–1 May 2024; Volume 3, pp. 785–800.
4. Chen, S.; Arrouays, D.; Leatitia Mulder, V.; Poggio, L.; Minasny, B.; Roudier, P.; Libohova, Z.; Lagacherie, P.; Shi, Z.; Hannam, J.; et al. Digital mapping of GlobalSoilMap soil properties at a broad scale: A review. Geoderma 2022, 409, 115567.
5. Yan, K.; Wang, D.; Feng, Y.; Hou, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H. Digital mapping of soil organic carbon in a plain area based on time-series features. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 171, 113215.
6. Narváez-Ortiz, W.A.; Reyes-Valdés, M.H.; Cabrera-De la Fuente, M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Multiple Linear and Polynomial Models for Studying the Dynamics of the Soil Solution. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 42.
7. Frolking, S.; Mahtta, R.; Milliman, T.; Esch, T.; Seto, K.C. Global Urban Structural Growth Shows a Profound Shift from Spreading out to Building Up. Nat. Cities 2024, 1, 555–566.
8. Davies, A.; Orsaria, A. Scale out with GlusterFS. Linux J. 2013, 2013, 1.
9. Madani, M.; Lacivita, V.; Shin, Y.; Tarakanova, A. Accelerating Materials Property Prediction via a Hybrid Transformer Graph Framework That Leverages Four Body Interactions. npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 15.
10. Lysogorskiy, Y.; Bochkarev, A.; Drautz, R. Graph Atomic Cluster Expansion for Foundational Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 114.
11. Engell, I.; Gerigk, J.; Linsler, D.; Joergensen, R.G.; Potthoff, M. Tillage and land use management effects on soil organic matter and soil microbial biomass in a field network of practical farms in France, Romania, and Sweden. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 202, 105584.
12. World Population Review. Largest US Cities by Population 2026. Available online: https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities (accessed on 8 April 2026).
13. Kang, Y.; Kim, J. ChatMOF: An Artificial Intelligence System for Predicting and Generating Metal-Organic Frameworks Using Large Language Models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4705.
14. Nilashi, M.; Minaei-Bidgoli, B.; Alghamdi, A.; Alrizq, M.; Alghamdi, O.; Nayer, F.K.; Aljehane, N.O.; Khosravi, A.; Mohd, S. Knowledge discovery for course choice decision in massive open online courses using machine learning approaches. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 199, 117092.
15. Rukhovich, D.; Koroleva, P.; Rukhovich, A.; Komissarov, M. A detailed mapping of soil organic matter content in arable land based on the multitemporal soil line coefficients and neural network filtering of big remote sensing data. Geoderma 2024, 447, 116941.
16. Social Vulnerability Index 2020. Available online: https://geohub.lacity.org/datasets/lacounty::social-vulnerability-index-2020/about (accessed on 15 July 2025).
17. USGS Landsat 8 Level 2, Collection 2, Tier 1|Earth Engine Data Catalog. Available online: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/LANDSAT_LC08_C02_T1_L2 (accessed on 16 September 2024).
18. Tziolas, N.; Tsakiridis, N.; Heiden, U.; van Wesemael, B. Soil organic carbon mapping utilizing convolutional neural networks and Earth observation data, a case study in Bavaria state Germany. Geoderma 2024, 444, 116867.
19. Residential Electric Rates|Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Available online: https://www.ladwp.com/account/understanding-your-rates/residential-electric-rates (accessed on 17 November 2025).
20. Kumar, A.; Kaur, P.; Sharma, P. A survey on Hoeffding tree stream data classification algorithms. CPUH-Res. J. 2015, 1, 28–32.
21. Domènech, J.; Gil, J.A.; Sahuquillo, J.; Pont, A. Web prefetching performance metrics: A survey. Perform. Eval. 2006, 63, 988–1004.
22. Kaundinya, P.R.; Choudhary, K.; Kalidindi, S.R. Prediction of the Electron Density of States for Crystalline Compounds with Atomistic Line Graph Neural Networks (ALIGNN). Jom 2022, 74, 1395–1405.
23. Hengl, T.; Mendes de Jesus, J.; Heuvelink, G.B.M.; Ruiperez Gonzalez, M.; Kilibarda, M.; Blagotić, A.; Shangguan, W.; Wright, M.N.; Geng, X.; Bauer-Marschallinger, B.; et al. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169748.
24. De Breuck, P.-P.; Evans, M.L.; Rignanese, G.-M. Robust Model Benchmarking and Bias-Imbalance in Data-Driven Materials Science: A Case Study on MODNet. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2021, 33, 404002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.