Transfer Learning Signals, Demand Forecasting, and Regional Energy Markets: Mixed Evaluation
Keywords:
Transfer Learning, Demand Forecasting, Energy Markets, Domain Adaptation, Time Series AnalysisAbstract
The integration of renewable energy sources and the ongoing decentralization of power grids have introduced unprecedented volatility into regional energy markets. Accurate demand forecasting is essential for ensuring grid stability, optimizing energy dispatch, and facilitating economic trading. However, newly established regional markets or smaller grid nodes frequently suffer from severe data scarcity, rendering traditional deep learning models ineffective due to their reliance on vast amounts of historical data. This paper presents a comprehensive mixed evaluation of transfer learning signals applied to demand forecasting within constrained regional energy markets. By leveraging data-rich source domains, we investigate the efficacy of transferring learned representations to data-poor target domains. The study proposes a domain adaptation framework that isolates and aligns temporal features, seasonal variations, and meteorological impacts across disparate geographical regions. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that the strategic utilization of transfer learning significantly reduces forecasting errors in the target domains while accelerating model convergence. The analysis highlights the specific types of signals most conducive to cross-regional transfer, such as macroscopic seasonal trends, contrasting them with localized micro-patterns that hinder model generalization. These findings provide critical insights for energy economists and grid operators seeking to deploy robust forecasting infrastructure in emerging, data-constrained energy markets.References
1. Tang, Y.; Sun, T.; Luo, Z.; Omidvar, H.; Theeuwes, N.; Xie, X.; Xiong, J.; Yao, R.; Grimmond, S. Urban Meteorological Forcing Data for Building Energy Simulations. Build. Environ. 2021, 204, 108088.
2. Shi, Z.; Xin, C.; Huo, T.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, B.; Chen, X.; Qin, W.; Ma, X.; Huang, G.; Wang, Z.; et al. A Fine-Tuned Large Language Model Based Molecular Dynamics Agent for Code Generation to Obtain Material Thermodynamic Parameters. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 10295.
3. Mortazavi, B. Recent Advances in Machine Learning-assisted Multiscale Design of Energy Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2403876.
4. Sothe, C.; Gonsamo, A.; Arabian, J.; Snider, J. Large scale mapping of soil organic carbon concentration with 3D machine learning and satellite observations. Geoderma 2022, 405, 115402.
5. Climate.OneBuilding. WMO Region 4 - North and Central America. Available online: https://climate.onebuilding.org/WMO_Region_4_North_and_Central_America/default.html (accessed on 20 January 2025).
6. City Planning Services|BuildLA. Available online: https://buildla.lacity.org/city-planning-services.html (accessed on 27 March 2026).
7. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; ACM: Singapore, 2016; pp. 785–794.
8. Schwaab, J.; Meier, R.; Mussetti, G.; Seneviratne, S.; Bürgi, C.; Davin, E.L. The Role of Urban Trees in Reducing Land Surface Temperatures in European Cities. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6763.
9. Oke, T.R. The Energetic Basis of the Urban Heat Island. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 108, 1–24.
10. Weather Averages Los Angeles, California. Available online: https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/los-angeles/california/united-states/usca1339 (accessed on 17 November 2025).
11. EnergyPlus Version 23.1 Documents. Available online: https://bigladdersoftware.com/epx/docs/23-1/ (accessed on 25 February 2026).
12. Friedman, J.H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 2001, 29, 1189–1232.
13. EnergyPlus. Available online: https://energyplus.net/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
14. Microsoft. US Building Footprints. Available online: https://github.com/microsoft/USBuildingFootprints (accessed on 15 July 2025).
15. Alyakoob, A.; Hartono, S.; Johnson, T.; Middel, A. Estimating Cooling Loads of Arizona State University Buildings Using Microclimate Data and Machine Learning. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 64, 105705.
16. Choi, H.; Varian, H. Predicting the present with Google Trends. Econ. Rec. 2012, 88, 2–9.
17. Tkacz, G. Predicting Recessions in Real-Time: Mining Google Trends and Electronic Payments Data for Clues. C.D. Howe Inst. Comment. 2013, 387. Available online: https://www.cdhowe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Commentary_387_0-1.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2025).
18. Fortuna, A.M.; Starks, P.J.; Moriasi, D.N. Estimation of soil organic carbon as a function of soil pretreatment and spectral features of radiometers within the visible and near-infrared spectra. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2025, 80, 476–490.
19. Tiffin, A. Seeing in the Dark: A Machine-Learning Approach to Nowcasting in Lebanon; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
20. Jung, J.K.; Patnam, M.; Ter-Martirosyan, A. An Algorithmic Crystal Ball: Forecasts-Based on Machine Learning; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
21. Kant, D.; Pick, A.; Winter, J.d. Nowcasting GDP using machine learning methods. Asta Adv. Stat. Anal. 2025, 109, 1–24.
22. Murphy, K.P. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012.
23. Freund, Y.; Schapire, R.E. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1996); Saitta, L., Ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 148–156.
24. Vu, T.-S.; Ha, M.-Q.; Nguyen, D.-N.; Nguyen, V.-C.; Abe, Y.; Tran, T.; Tran, H.; Kino, H.; Miyake, T.; Tsuda, K.; et al. Towards Understanding Structure–Property Relations in Materials with Interpretable Deep Learning. npj Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 215.
25. Guo, K.; Li, H.; Shao, X.; Shi, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Du, C.; Wang, J.; Feng, S.; et al. Unveiling Tribological Mechanisms of MoS2 Coatings on FeNiCr Alloys via Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2026, 100323.
26. Liu, Y.; Guo, B.; Zou, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, S. Machine Learning Assisted Materials Design and Discovery for Rechargeable Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 31, 434–450.
27. Hoogsteen, M.J.J.; Lantinga, E.A.; Bakker, E.J.; Groot, J.C.J.; Tittonell, P.A. Estimating soil organic carbon through loss on ignition: Effects of ignition conditions and structural water loss. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2015, 66, 320–328.
28. Novielli, P.; Magarelli, M.; Romano, D.; Di Bitonto, P.; Stellacci, A.M.; Monaco, A.; Amoroso, N.; Bellotti, R.; Tangaro, S. Leveraging explainable AI to predict soil respiration sensitivity and its drivers for climate change mitigation. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12527.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.